Legislation Details

File #: 27-0163   
Type: Public Hearing Status: Agenda Ready
In control: Board of County Commissioners
On agenda: 11/10/2026 Final action:
Title: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING DIVISION 5, HOBE SOUND, ARTICLE 12, COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CODE, LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MARTIN COUNTY CODE, REGARDING MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR LIGHT FIXTURES FOR CERTAIN RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Attachments: 1. 2026_1016_LDR 26-02_Staff Report_Final.pdf, 2. 2026_1110_LDR 26-02_Draft Ord.pdf, 3. 2026_1016_LDR 26-02_Application Materials.pdf, 4. Disclosure of Interest.pdf, 5. 2026_1023_LDR 26-02_LAD_TS.PDF, 6. Staff Presentation.pdf

PLACEMENT: Public Hearings

TITLE:

title  

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING DIVISION 5, HOBE SOUND, ARTICLE 12, COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CODE, LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MARTIN COUNTY CODE, REGARDING MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR LIGHT FIXTURES FOR CERTAIN RECREATIONAL FACILITIES

end

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

executive summary

This is a request by Architects Design Collaborative, LLC, on behalf of Boys & Girls Club of Martin County, for approval of an amendment to Division 5, Hobe Sound, Article 12, Community Redevelopment Code, Land Development Regulations, Martin County Code, to allow a maximum height of 60 feet for light fixtures for recreational facilities that are owned and operated as part of an institutional use. The applicant’s proposed amendment would only be applicable to the Hobe Sound Community Redevelopment Area.

body

DEPARTMENT: Growth Management                     

PREPARED BY:                      Name: John Sinnott                     

                     Title:                     Principal Planner                     

REQUESTED BY: Architects Design Collaborative, LLC, Raul Ocampo, Jr.                                          

 

PRESET:     

PROCEDURES: None                     

 

BACKGROUND/RELATED STRATEGIC GOAL:

 

Article 12 establishes Redevelopment Zoning Districts, permitted uses and development standards to implement the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP) and the Community Redevelopment Plans in Martin County's six Community Redevelopment Areas (CRAs).

 

Section 3.14.B.4, Land Development Regulations, Martin County Code, contains a height exception for lighting structures for public park facilities. Public park facilities within the CRAs are eligible for this height exception. However, there is no similar exception for lighting structures for recreational facilities developed as part of an institutional use such as a community center operated by a not-for-profit entity. Currently, the allowable height for lighting structures for recreational facilities operated by such institutional uses within a CRA would be limited by the maximum building height in the Subdistrict.

 

The applicant proposes to add Section 12.5.04.7 to Division 5, Hobe Sound, of Article 12 to allow a maximum height of 60 feet for light fixtures for recreational facilities that are owned and operated as part of an institutional use. The proposed amendment also stipulates that such lighting must cease operation by 10:00pm. The proposed amendment would only be applicable to the Hobe Sound CRA.

 

This matter was properly noticed and heard before the Local Planning Agency (LPA) on November 5, 2026. The recommendation will be provided to the Board of County Commissioners.

 

The following supporting documents are attached:

                     Staff Report                     

                     Draft Ordinance

                     Application Materials

                     Disclosure of Interest

                     Legal Ad

                     Staff Presentation

 

ISSUES:

 

None

 

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW:

 

This is a legislative matter. Legislative decisions are those in which the local government formulates policy rather than applying specific rules to a particular situation. A local government’s approval or denial of an issue in its legislative capacity is typically subject to a fairly debatable standard of review. Fairly debatable means that the government’s action must be upheld if reasonable minds could differ as to the propriety of the decision reached. Decisions subject to the fairly debatable standard of review need only be rationally related to a legitimate public purpose, such as the health, safety, and welfare of the public, to be valid. Given this broad discretion, only decisions that are arbitrary and capricious or illegal are subject to serious legal challenge.

 

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

 

RECOMMENDATION

Move that the Board adopt the proposed Ordinance amending Article 12, Community Redevelopment Code, Land Development Regulations, Martin County Code.

 

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

Direct staff accordingly.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

 

RECOMMENDATION

The applicant has paid the $3,115.00 application fee.

                     

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

None

 

DOCUMENT(S) REQUIRING ACTION:

☐Budget Transfer / Amendment                     ☐ Chair Letter                                                               ☐Contract / Agreement

☐Grant / Application                                          ☐Notice          ☒Ordinance                     ☐Resolution

☐Other: