Martin County

File #: 25-0089   
Type: Public Hearing Status: Passed
In control: Board of County Commissioners
On agenda: 10/22/2024 Final action: 10/22/2024
Title: LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER TRANSMITTAL OF EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 24-02, OVERALL GOALS AND DEFINITIONS, A TEXT AMENDMENT
Attachments: 1. Ch. 2 EAR_Staff Report_10-22-24.pdf, 2. Chapter_2_OVERALL_GOALS_AND_DEFINITIONS_10-3-24.pdf, 3. Ch. 2 Matrix EAR.pdf, 4. 2024_0815_LPA Approved Minutes.pdf, 5. 2024_0823_All EAR Amendments_ LAD Tearsheet.pdf, 6. Ch. 2 Public Comment.pdf

PLACEMENT: Public Hearings

TITLE:

title  

LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER TRANSMITTAL OF EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 24-02, OVERALL GOALS AND DEFINITIONS, A TEXT AMENDMENT

end

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

executive summary

A request to consider transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 24-02, a text amendment to Chapter 2, Overall Goals and Definitions, of the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan based upon the 2024 EAR.

body

DEPARTMENT: Growth Management                     

PREPARED BY:                      Name: Jenna Knobbe                     

                     Title:                     Senior Planner                     

REQUESTED BY: Board of County Commissioners                                          

 

PRESET:    

PROCEDURES: None                     

 

BACKGROUND/RELATED STRATEGIC GOAL:

 

In accordance with Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes, evaluation and appraisal plan amendments must follow the State Coordinated Review Process.

 

All plan amendments require three public hearings. The first public hearing for this plan amendment was conducted before the Local Planning Agency. At the second hearing the Board of County Commissioners determines whether to transmit or not to transmit plan amendments as part of a set of amendments. After the hearing, the County has 10 working days to send the amendments to the state land planning agency (State).

 

The State will issue an objections, recommendations, and comments report (ORC) regarding the proposed plan amendment(s) within 60 days after receipt of the amendment package. Any other unit of local government or government agency may provide comments within 30 days after receipt by the state land planning agency of the complete proposed plan or plan amendment.

 

Martin County must hold the adoption public hearing within 180 days after receipt of the ORC report. If the County fails to hold a second hearing (adoption hearing) within 180 days after receipt of the ORC report, the amendments shall be deemed withdrawn unless extended by agreement with notice to the state land planning agency and any affected person that provided comments on the amendment. After the adoption hearing, adopted plan amendments must be transmitted within 10 working days to the State and any other agency or local government that provided timely comments.

 

The State has 45 days to determine if the plan amendments are in compliance with Florida Statute and will issue a notice of intent to find that the plan amendments are in compliance or not in compliance. A plan amendment adopted under the state coordinated review process shall go into effect pursuant to the state land planning agency’s notice of intent. If timely challenged, an amendment does not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance.

 

Decisions approving or rejecting proposed amendments constitute legislative actions because they involve the policy making function of the BCC. They are different from rezoning and site plan decisions which are quasi-judicial actions involving the application of general rules of policy to specific situations. If approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment is challenged by an affected person, the approval will be sustained if it complies with Florida Statutes regarding (1) procedural requirements (e.g. proper notice, public hearing), and (2) substantive requirements (e.g. adequate data and analysis, internal consistency). The fairly debatable standard is applicable to the review and requires judicial approval of a BCC approval if reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the decision. For example, if a petitioner were to claim that an amendment adopted a provision that was not consistent with an existing provision of the Comprehensive Plan, the court would strike down the amendment only if the court found no reasonable person would think that the two provisions are consistent.

 

The Local Planning Agency reviewed the amendment on August 15, 2024 and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. The Board of County Commissioners reviewed the amendment on September 24, 2024 and voted 5-0 to continue the public hearing to October 22, 2024. The amendment was returned to the Local Planning Agency on October 3, 2024 to address proposed changes consistent with Chapter 1, Preamble and Chapter 4, Future Land Use Element.  The LPA voted 3-1 to recommend approval.

 

ISSUES:

 

At the direction of the Board, staff scheduled the public hearings for the EAR based plan amendments on the following dates:

September 10, 2024

September 24, 2024

October 22, 2024

Each public hearing that was opened on September 10 and 24 was continued to October 22, 2024. During the October 22, 2024, Board meeting, each public hearing opened on September 10 and 24 will be reopened for the Board to vote on transmittal of the amendment to the State land planning agency.

 

Please see the attached staff report for analysis of the proposed amendment.

 

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW:

 

This is a legislative matter. Legislative decisions are those in which the local government formulates policy rather than applying specific rules to a particular situation. A local government’s approval or denial of an issue in its legislative capacity is typically subject to a fairly debatable standard of review. Fairly debatable means that the government’s action must be upheld if reasonable minds could differ as to the propriety of the decision reached. Decisions subject to the fairly debatable standard of review need only be rationally related to a legitimate public purpose, such as the health, safety, and welfare of the public, to be valid. Given this broad discretion, only decisions that are arbitrary and capricious or illegal are subject to serious legal challenge.

 

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

 

RECOMMENDATION

Move that the Board approval transmittal of CPA 24-02, Chapter 2, Overall Goals and Definitions to the State Land Planning Agency and other state and regional reviewing agencies.

 

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

Move that staff provide additional information and continue the item to a future date.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

 

RECOMMENDATION

Staff time.

                     

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

Staff time.

 

DOCUMENT(S) REQUIRING ACTION:

Budget Transfer / Amendment                      Chair Letter                                                               Contract / Agreement

Grant / Application                                          Notice          Ordinance                     Resolution

Other:     

This document may be reproduced upon request in an alternative format by contacting the County ADA Coordinator (772) 320-3131, the County Administration Office (772) 288-5400, Florida Relay 711, or by completing our accessibility feedback form at www.martin.fl.us/accessibility-feedback <http://www.martin.fl.us/accessibility-feedback>.