Legislation Details

File #: 24-1234   
Type: Public Hearing Status: Passed
In control: Board of County Commissioners
On agenda: 8/27/2024 Final action: 8/27/2024
Title: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 4, CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGARDING REDUCTION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT LIENS
Attachments: 1. Lien Reduction Ordinance.pdf

PLACEMENT: Public Hearings

TITLE:

title  

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 4, CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGARDING REDUCTION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT LIENS

end

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

executive summary

The Board is asked to approve amendments to the General Ordinances codifying the reduction of code enforcement liens.

body

DEPARTMENT: County Attorney                     

PREPARED BY:                      Name: Sebastian Poprawski                     

                     Title:                     Senior Assistant County Attorney                     

REQUESTED BY: Sebastian Poprawski                                          

 

PRESET:     

PROCEDURES: None                     

 

BACKGROUND/RELATED STRATEGIC GOAL:

 

The Board has adopted Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 1.98, General Ordinances, to implement liens for code enforcement violations.  On July 9, 2024, the Board directed staff to codify reductions for code enforcement liens to no less than 10% of the total lien amount, or 10% of the value of the violating property, whichever is less.  The proposed amendment to Section 1.98 of the General Ordinances would codify the reduction. 

 

ISSUES:

 

Whether to adopt a formal policy for code enforcement lien reductions.

 

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW:

 

This is a legislative matter. Legislative decisions are those in which the local government formulates policy rather than applying specific rules to a particular situation. A local government’s approval or denial of an issue in its legislative capacity is typically subject to a fairly debatable standard of review. Fairly debatable means that the government’s action must be upheld if reasonable minds could differ as to the propriety of the decision reached. Decisions subject to the fairly debatable standard of review need only be rationally related to a legitimate public purpose, such as the health, safety, and welfare of the public, to be valid. Given this broad discretion, only decisions that are arbitrary and capricious or illegal are subject to serious legal challenge.

 

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

 

RECOMMENDATION

Move that the Board adopt the proposed Ordinance.

 

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

Direct staff accordingly.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

 

RECOMMENDATION

None

                     

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

None

 

DOCUMENT(S) REQUIRING ACTION:

☐Budget Transfer / Amendment                     ☐ Chair Letter                                                               ☐Contract / Agreement

☐Grant / Application                                          ☐Notice          ☒Ordinance                     ☐Resolution

☐Other:     

This document may be reproduced upon request in an alternative format by contacting the County ADA Coordinator (772) 320-3131, the County Administration Office (772) 288-5400, Florida Relay 711, or by completing our accessibility feedback form at www.martin.fl.us/accessibility-feedback <http://www.martin.fl.us/accessibility-feedback>.