Martin County

File #: 18-0533   
Type: Public Hearing Status: Passed
In control: Board of County Commissioners
On agenda: 7/10/2018 Final action: 7/10/2018
Title: PROPOSED MARTIN COUNTY SETTLEMENT - JUAN CARLOS GIL V. MARTIN COUNTY, CASE NO. 2:18-CV-14110
Attachments: 1. Gil Settlement Agreement.pdf

PLACEMENT: Public Hearings

TITLE:

title  

PROPOSED MARTIN COUNTY SETTLEMENT - JUAN CARLOS GIL V. MARTIN COUNTY, CASE NO. 2:18-CV-14110

end

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

executive summary

In accordance with the procedure established by the Board of County Commissioners (the “Board”), the public is provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed settlement in the case of Juan Carlos Gil v. Martin County, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 2:18-cv-14110. This case arose out of Mr. Gil’s claim that the County’s website violates federal law because the blind or visually impaired cannot access documents on the website. The County is self-insured and TRICO (our insurance pool) assigned counsel to the matter. A proposed settlement is before the Board for consideration.

body

DEPARTMENT: County Attorney                     

PREPARED BY:                      Name: David Arthur                     

                     Title:                     Senior Assistant County Attorney                     

REQUESTED BY:                                                

 

PRESET:     

PROCEDURES: None                     

 

BACKGROUND/RELATED STRATEGIC GOAL:

 

Mr. Gil is legally blind, and he alleges he could not access documents on the County’s website using screen reader software used by blind or visually-impaired individuals.  He further alleges his inability to access the website’s documents constitutes discrimination against disabled persons in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. 

 

A public hearing on this proposed settlement is required by the Settlement Procedures previously adopted by the Board.  Any proposed settlement of a discrimination claim or other matter in excess of $5,000 must be considered at a public hearing prior to finalizing the agreement.  If the Board approves, following the hearing, County staff will finalize the agreement.

 

ISSUES:

 

Whether the Board should approve the settlement agreement.

 

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW:

 

Attorney John F. Dickinson of Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete LLP was assigned as counsel for this case and represented the County. David Arthur, Senior Assistant County Attorney, is co-counsel on this case. It is the recommendation of Mr. Dickinson and Mr. Arthur that this settlement is in the best interests of the County.

 

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

 

RECOMMENDATION

Move that the Board approve the settlement agreement.

 

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

None

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

 

RECOMMENDATION

The settlement amount is within the reserves set aside for this case.

                     

Funding Source

County Funds

Non-County Funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal

 

 

Project Total

 


ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

None

 

DOCUMENT(S) REQUIRING ACTION:

Budget Transfer / Amendment                      Chair Letter                                                               Contract / Agreement

Grant / Application                                          Notice          Ordinance                     Resolution

Other:   Settlement Agreement