Martin County

File #: 20-0635   
Type: Public Hearing Quasi Judicial Status: Passed
In control: Board of County Commissioners
On agenda: 5/5/2020 Final action: 5/5/2020
Title: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT OF THE MARTIN COUNTY ZONING ATLAS TO CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT FOR CPA 19-22, PUBLIX SUPERMARKET FLUM
Attachments: 1. 1_Final Staff Report_Rezoning 19-22_Publix.pdf, 2. Application Materials Rezoning.pdf, 3. MeetingMinutes&OtherMaterials_Rezoning.pdf, 4. Resolution.pdf
PLACEMENT: Public Hearings - Quasi-Judicial
TITLE:
title
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT OF THE MARTIN COUNTY ZONING ATLAS TO CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT FOR CPA 19-22, PUBLIX SUPERMARKET FLUM
end
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
executive summary
This amendment is concurrent to a request to amend the future land use designation from Agricultural to General Commercial future land use on a 6-acre portion of a 16.72-acre parcel, located at the southeast corner of SW Kanner Highway and SW Pratt Whitney Road. The applicant requests to rezone the entire property from A-1 and R-3A to GC, General Commercial zoning district.
body
DEPARTMENT: Growth Management
PREPARED BY: Name: Maria Jose, M.S.
Title: Planner
REQUESTED BY: Publix Supermarket, Inc.

PRESET:
PROCEDURES: Quasi-Judicial

BACKGROUND/RELATED STRATEGIC GOAL:

Comprehensive Growth Management Plan Policy 4.4A.1. provides that "Parcels being considered for amendment to the future land use designation shall be concurrently evaluated for rezoning to the most appropriate zoning district in the most recently adopted Land Development Regulations."

ISSUES:

A concurrent rezoning is required for each Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment where the amendment creates an inconsistency with the current zoning designation. Analysis of the proposed rezoning can be found in the staff report attached to this Board Item.

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW:

Because this request involves the application of a policy to a specific application and site, it is a quasi-judicial decision. Quasi-judicial proceedings must be conducted with more formality than a legislative proceeding. In quasi-judicial proceedings, parties are entitled - as a matter of due process- to cross examine witnesses, present evidence, demand that witnesses testify under oath, and demand a decision based on a correct application of the law and competent substantial evidence in the record.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

RECOMMENDATION
1. Move that the Board recei...

Click here for full text