Martin County

File #: 21-0615   
Type: Consent Status: Agenda Ready
In control: Board of County Commissioners
On agenda: 4/27/2021 Final action:
Title: REQUEST FOR FINE REDUCTION STIPULATION AND AGREED RECOMMENDED ORDER REGARDING THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE OF RAYMOND W. HOFFMAN CASE NUMBER ENF2019040699
Attachments: 1. SIGNED FINE REDUCTION ENF2019040699.pdf
PLACEMENT: Consent
TITLE:
title
REQUEST FOR FINE REDUCTION STIPULATION AND AGREED RECOMMENDED ORDER REGARDING THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE OF RAYMOND W. HOFFMAN CASE NUMBER ENF2019040699
end
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
executive summary
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1.98B, General Ordinance, Martin County Code, the Board of County Commissioners is asked to consider approval of a Fine Reduction Stipulation and Agreed Recommended order regarding the Code Enforcement case of Raymond W. Hoffman.
body
DEPARTMENT: Building
PREPARED BY: Name: Rachel Spradley
Title: Nuisance Abatement Coordinator
REQUESTED BY: Raymond W Hoffman

PRESET:
PROCEDURES: None

BACKGROUND/RELATED STRATEGIC GOAL:

Raymond W. Hoffman Fine Reduction Request

This Fine Reduction Stipulation and Agreed Recommended Order involves a parcel located at 1238 SW Buckskin Trail, Stuart, FL 34957.

On October 16, 2019, an Order Finding Violation was issued by the Code Enforcement Magistrate to Raymond W. Hoffman for the following violation(s): Section 21.99 - Accessory Structures, General Ordinances, Martin County Code; Section 21.118 Stairway - Stairways, Decks, Porches And Balconies, General Ordinances, Martin County Code; and Section 67.201.A Weeds - Nuisance Declared: Weeds, Undergrowth, General Ordinances, Martin County Code.

Compliance was required by November 29, 2019. On February 11, 2021, an Affidavit of Compliance/Accrued Fines was issued reflecting an outstanding fine of $21,900.00 plus costs in the amount of $ 575.00.
Staff has determined that a lien reduction is warranted. The Respondent brought the property into compliance and has offered to pay $2,190.00 to resolve the outstanding fines which have accrued. The respondent paid the administrative cost of $575.00 on February 16, 2021.

ISSUES:

None

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW:

This item has been reviewed for legal sufficiency to determine whether it is consistent with applicable law, has identified and addressed legal ris...

Click here for full text